22 02 2022
JUDGE AMANDA HENDERSON
OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ( Private Corporation, Fictitious Complainant)
DILLON (Fictitious Legal Entity, Nom De Guerre)
Reference # 1054440
now, I, at arms length to the court, a living man called paddy,
competent, animated fractal of the Divine, the anima and the animus,
a true trust expressed – Mind, Body and Soul entrusted to I by the
master encoder, the blueprinter of the spark and the seed. I am made
in the image of God, the Divine within I, and I a follower of the
Divine Law first and foremost, the laws of nature, and the laws of
man when they are not in conflict. I have personal knowledge of the
matters stated herein, I am of the age of majority and I understand
both the spiritual and material liabilities of “Thou shalt not bear
reserve, claim all and waive none ever, my God given rights, inherent
upon Creation, unalienable , safeguarded for I and we the people by
God and under the
Declaration of Human Rights 1948
Convention on Human Rights 1953
Convention 1899 & 1907
Of Rights 1688
Rights Act 1998
Covenant of Civil & Political Rights 1966
Rights fundamental to the reason for being born, spirit incarnate
into the physical body and a mind to freely use to do God’s will on
I am not a UK citizen, I am a protected person as defined under the
Geneva Convention and International Humanitarian Law.
I am not an agent nor an employee of the Department of Health and
there is no principal between God and I.
do not consent to the Health Protection (Coronavirus,
Restrictions) (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 which
is based upon the Public Health
Act 1984 Sections 37 and 38 pertaining to the removal and
detention of people suffering from tuberculosis, which also did not
stand up to scrutiny under the European Convention on Human Rights,
the 1984 Act failing to provide civil safeguards, contravening
Article 5(1) of European Convention on Human Rights:
(1) Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one
shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in
accordance with a procedure prescribed by law.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
- Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one will be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established at law.
- Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.
- Anyone who is arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release. It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall not be detained in custody, but release maybe subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgement.
- Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before the court, in order that that court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful.
- Anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation.
charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed
innocent until proved guilty according to law.
the determination of any criminal charge against him, everyone shall
be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:
(a) To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he
understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him;
(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his
defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing:
(g) Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.
has a right to an effective remedy by the competent national
tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by
the constitution or law.
one shall be subject to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his
rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
To Dismiss With Prejudice
received by the Court on 14th
January 2021 and attached as I assert:
The DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS and its alleged agent has no
b) If the public prosecution service is representing an injured party and a direct causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the accused, and not as a result of some independent 3rd party who is not in the court, then the public prosecution service should present that man/woman with a verified claim to the court.
c) The court cannot redress the injury because no such injury exists.
d) Since there is no injured party, and the plaintiff is a corporation then this must be a civil case and I demand to see the international contact and demand the prosecutor verifies my right to subrogation.
e) Since I have never signed anything, was never presented with a charging instrument at the time of unlawful arrest and detention and have never relinquished any inherent rights except under duress and threat of armed force and further detention at an unknown location.
me invito factus, non est meus actus. An act done by me against my
will, is not my act.
f) I demand that this Court provides me with a copy of the factual evidence that the public prosecution filed onto the court record proving persona jurisdiction.
Furthermore, since the suspension of habeas corpus, the absence of a
jury and an injured party, the Emergency Powers legislation and the
fact this court is not one of public record, it is prima facie
evidence that this court is a Military Commission.
I demand that this Commission provide me with
a copy of the factual evidence that the public prosecution service
has filed that proves that the claim the prosecutor is asserting,
applies to me simply because the alleged events happened within the
State of Northern Ireland.
I demand that this Commission provide all the paperwork, affidavits
of service, charge sheet etc to show that due process have been
applied in this matter.
c) I must put the Commission on Notice that if the prosecutor has failed to file this information, then the court must dismiss the charges otherwise it will be proceeding in bad faith.
d) I must put the Commission on Notice that to continue to try a protected person in a Public Court (military commission court) without evidence of persona jurisdiction is a War Crime and that the court, court clerk and prosecutor no longer have any good faith defence in this matter.
Furthermore, the fraudulent summons that was left with my aged father
accompanied with threats, and all further correspondence from the
public prosecution service delivered without a Royal Mail stamp in
window envelopes (mail fraud) do not have upon their face, my full
given appellative in upper and lower case letters.
The title to proceedings on the purported summons sheet, is known as
PATRICK DILLON, on police testimony as Mr. Patrick Dillon and Mr.
Dillon, and as DILLON PATRICK on the court listing. I refer the
respondent to the unrebutted Affidavit Of Status attached regarding
my given call signs, and also to Black’s Law Dictionary,
evidence that names are designations of artificial persons or legal
fictions can be found in the legal definition of the word name.
Law Dictionary (6th
edition) defines the word name
these exact words: “The designation of an individual person, or of
a firm or corporation.”
The word corporation
defined by the same law dictionary as, “An artificial
legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a
state.” Based on the definitions in this paragraph, in law, a name
is a designation of a corporation which is an artificial person.
The public prosecution service, are presuming the accused to be the
agent of a dead entity with a name that is similar but not the same.
non est eadem, nam nullum simile est idem. What is like is not the
same, for nothing similar is the same. 4 Co. 18
Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators, 3 U.S. 3 Dall. 54 (1795)
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can only interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them”
S.C.R 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.54), Supreme Court of the United States
public prosecution service and the PSNI agents are using trickery and
threat of force and detention to deceive I, a living man into
accepting surety-ship and swindle I into paying charges levied
against a corporate fictitious dead entity.
Therefore the records of the Commission are not written in proper
English, being such they cannot be recognised lawfully, for the
reason they violate our customs and usages; and have no effect, force
or operation outside the venue from which they originate.
Neutral citation  NIQB 66
Caoimhin Mac Giolla Cathain v. The Northern Ireland Court Service
I contend that pursuant to the European Convention on Human Rights,
Article 6 Section 3 (a) I have the following rights:
To be informed promptly, in a language which I understand and in
detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against me. This
right was clearly denied the accused as evidenced after the unlawful
arrest, assault and unlawful detention of the accused in the back of
the P.S.N.I land rover, on JM1 Murphy’s Body Worn Video Footage and
our dialogue at time-stamp 0032630
The reason you were arrested is because we can’t identify you.
Do us a favour, give Bessie a shout and see if that Covid thing is
applicable for being reported along with the obstruction.
what’s that? It’s a radio
The covid is the ticket, the covid legislation or covid regulations
cos you were arrested for it.
I furthermore contend the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction as
all the court documents are full of misnomers and the name of the
accused on the summons is a nom de guerre, in debased Latin which is
criminal and renders every court or corporate government that tenders
such text as counterfeit.
viperina est quie corrodit viscera textus. It is a poisonous gloss
which corrupts the essence of the text. 11 Coke 34
I can have a fair trial all the misnomers and Nom De Guerra’s will
have to be corrected and the prosecutor will have to provide me with
a glossary of all words in their documents, the lexicon used to
define those words and the styles manual used to construct all their
The lack of this is prima facie evidence of bad faith on behalf of
the Prosecutor, as the Prosecutor is trying to hoodwink I into
“The act of applying a wrong name…to a person. An error in
naming a person or place in a legal document.”Webster’s
New World Dictionary, Third
College Edition, 1988, page 867.
in name; giving incorrect name to a person in accusation, indictment,
pleading, deed or other instrument. Under rules of practice in some
states, such is ground for
dismissal by motion. In most
states, however, as well as in the federal courts, such misnomer can
be corrected by amendment of the pleadings.”Black’s
Law Dictionary, 6th edition,
is a good plea in abatement,
for since names are the only marks and indicia which human kind can
understand each other by, if the name be omitted or mistaken, there
is a complaint against nobody. And…if the defendant has been
arrested by a wrong name, the court will set
aside the proceedings…and
discharge him if in custody.” 4 Bacon’s Abridgment, (D) of
Misnomer, and want of Addition (1832), page 7.
I furthermore contend that the police Smith and Murphy and the
entirety of the police force at Stormont on the day of my unlawful
arrest and detention acted beyond the scope of their enforcement
powers in direct contravention to the core policing principles of
their Code of Ethics especially but not limited to Article 1.1:
officers shall obey and uphold the law, protect human dignity and
uphold the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all persons as
enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998, the European Convention on
Human Rights and other relevant international human rights
Sergeant Smith failed in his professional duty, as evidenced in the
video Peaceful Gathering at Stormont 18102020 pt 2 time-stamp 18.13
, where he is clearly seen pulling a young woman to the ground and
causing physical damage and harm by his excessive force and action.
Sergeant Smith also breached Article 1.9 of the Police Service Of
Northern Code Of Ethics,
officers shall ensure that accurate records are kept of their duties
as required by relevant Codes of Practice and Police Service policy
and procedure. Police officers shall not through neglect make any
false, misleading or inaccurate oral or written statement or entry in
any such record or document made, kept or required for police
In a litany of false and misleading statements made by both Murphy
and Smith in their written witness statements Sergeant Smith tells a
blatant lie in his, “ The
crowd became highly agitated and aggressive moving in towards
Constable Murphy and I. Some of the crowd now took an active part in
attempting to obstruct the arrest by wrapping arms around the
detained person’s neck and grabbing at myself as I could feel hands
on my body pulling my uniform. I was afraid that I may be taken to
the ground by the mob”.
As it can be clearly seen in the video Peaceful Gathering at Stormont
18102020 pt 2 at time-stamp 18.08 – 18.34, and on the video
Belfast Stormont Lockdown Protest Gets Violent – Police Brutality
at timestamp 23.08,
this is untrue, as Smith was clearly unhindered when he moved away
from the accused and forcefully threw the young woman, Emma Louise,
to the ground.
and by the admission of the Ombudsman
the PSNI were careful in their use of the Regulations, particularly
by following the four Es of; Engage, Explain, Encourage and
Enforcement. They went out of their way to avoid enforcement, took
the initiative to protect those at risk of abuse in their homes, took
care of those detained and only used SBGs against those who were
trying to spit at them or to bite them. However, it is not clear that
they were helped to understand the overlap between the Regulations
and the Human Rights Act by the Executive or Assembly Members and may
have not done enough to protect the right to protest safely.
Stormont for some reason the P.S.N.I did not go out of their way to
avoid enforcement. They enforced the corporate medical rules with
unnecessary force and zeal.
As evidenced on the day of my unlawful arrest and detention I had no
real knowledge of the law I was being accused of breaking. Refer to
JM1 Murphy’s Body Worn Video Footage and our dialogue at time-stamp
we don’t know the law.
I told you the law out there. I can’t discuss this with you o.k,
Paddy. I can’t discuss this with you.
this encounter it became clear that Murphy did not know anything
about the law either, having arrested me for Obstruction, even though
he, as a Constable, was not investigating any crime at common law.
Furthermore, evidenced moments prior to unlawful arrest, assault and
unlawful detention of the accused, when the accused claimed the right
to remain silent, JM1 Murphy’s Body Worn Video Footage and our
dialogue at time-stamp 0026730,
I don’t think I have done anything wrong, I don’t have to leave the
area. I haven’t committed a crime.
The arrest and detention of the accused was unlawful according to
(i)Rice v Connolly
2 QB 414,  2 All ER 649,  3 WLR 17, 130 JP 322
is also in my judgment clear that it is part of the obligations and
duties of a police constable to take all steps which appear to him
necessary for keeping the peace, for preventing crime or for
protecting property from criminal injury. There is no exhaustive
definition of the powers and obligations of the police, but they are
at least those, and they would further include the duty todetect
crime and to bring an offender to justice.” Chief Justice Lord
(ii)Sir Hugh Orde, Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Gerard Devlin
Citation no.  NICA 22
 “We conclude that the appellant by his failure to co-operate cannot be said to have obstructed the constable by failure to give the constable his name and address when he was under no legal duty to do so”. Lord Justice Campbell
Since Constable Murphy and Sergeant Smith were acting under the Oath
of Office of a Police Constable, being,
hereby do solemnly and sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I
will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of constable, with
fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding
fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all
individuals and their traditions and beliefs; and that while I
continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and
knowledge discharge all the duties thereof according to law.”
arrest was clearly unlawful because no crime was being committed, and
the accused did not obstruct the constable in his duty to investigate
crime at common-law.
i) It is axiomatic that Constable Murphy was not acting under his Oath-of-Office but as a military officer working on behalf of corporate medical interests, and therefore, he was impersonating a constable as he clearly states in his written testimony that he is a constable and in uniform.
As evidenced on the day of the unlawful arrest and detention, the
accused had particular knowledge of the malicious fraud being
perpetrated on the people. Refer to JM1 Murphy’s Body Worn Video
Footage and our dialogue at time-stamp 0043111:
did you ever study germ theory, no?
Germ? What’s that?
Germ Theory, Louis Pasteur? Do you know anything about viruses,
Not really , I’m not going to say I do, cos I don’t.
Following on from the one-sided conversation on germ theory, the
accused may have elaborated on the work of Louis Pasteur the father
of vaccines, but the right to freedom of speech was denied and
violated, as the accused was ordered to leave the area or suffer
further unlawful arrest and detention under threat of force as
evidenced by JM1 Murphy’s Body Worn Video Footage at time-stamp
Once I let you out it’s going to have to be a case that you leave
the area, you can’t go back into that crowd. If you go back into that
crowd you are going have to be arrested and brought to the police
station because you are just not listening to the reasoning here.
furthermore at time-stamp 0040771,
Do you understand what I’m saying here? If I release you here and
don’t bring you to the police station you have to leave the area, you
can’t go back into the crowd, you can’t partake in this anymore,
Murphy and Smith continued to Trespass on the living man the next
day, when they both wrote false written testimony as evidence for
the prosecution to be used in an attempt to convict the living man of
Pertaining to my questions to Constable Murphy about germ theory and
my request for further and better particulars in an unrebutted
affidavit of fact (filed with the court 15th January
2022), and furthermore to the Motion To Dismiss this case (filed with
the court on February 1st 2022) see attached the accused
recommends the respondent consider the following with particular
The burden of proof falls on the claimant, and the claimant cannot provide,
proof the purified SARS-COV-2 questionable virus has been isolated in accordance with the gold standard Koch’s postulates,
proof the isolated SARS-COV-2 causes the illness Covid-19,
proof that a man/woman transmits sickness to another just by contact,
proof that a man/woman transmits sickness to another just by breathing near him,
proof that any of the following measures: social distancing; wearing a mask, getting tested, isolating and lock downs; do not cause harm to the living man.
The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (No.2) Regulations
(Northern Ireland) 2020 was outside the legislative competence of
the Stormont ministers in the first place, even if they did get a
chance to vote on its introduction, consistent to Section 6-(1) and
6-(2)c of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. It is in direct
contravention to the European Convention on Human Rights.
10) The Department of Health(a), makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 25C(1), (3)(c), (4)(d) and 25F(2) of the Public Health Act (Northern Ireland) 1967(b). These Regulations are made in response to the serious and imminent threat to public health which is posed by the incidence and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) in Northern Ireland. The Department of Health considers that the restrictions and requirements imposed by these Regulations are proportionate to what they seek to achieve, which is a public health response to that threat. In accordance with section 25Q of that Act the Department of Health is of the opinion that, by reason of urgency, it is necessary to make these Regulations without a draft having been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, the Assembly.
11) Some Acts of Parliament are codified common law, and that has created tremendous confusion, where even those who are meant to be upholding the rule of law have no idea or way of distinguishing the difference.
12) It is legislatively affirmed in §49 of the Senior Court Act 1981 that the rules of equity prevail in the event of a conflict with the common law, and what is fair and just is determined by each individuals conscience, thereby admitting, and hence settling, that Acts of Parliament are not law.
13). Lex non cogit impossibilia. The law requires nothing impossible. Co. Litt. 231, b; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 951 Acts of Parliament, being the creations of fictions of law, by impossibility they cannot be law except law for their creators.
14) The “Coronavirus Regulations” were forced upon the people by Minister for Health Robin Swann and the Department Of Health , Chief Medical Officer Michael Mc Bride and Elizabeth Redmond, a senior officer of the Department Of Health, all Crown Corporate agents of Rothschild East India Trading Company, Vanguard and Blackrock, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements whose plan for Europe is trillions of Euros in vaccine sales.
15)The death, sickness, suffering, loneliness, isolation, social upheaval, suicides, heartbreak, financial ruin, and division perpetrated on the people of Northern Ireland and on the peoples of Earth, because of the deception of virology and the disproportionate yet planned response to a fake manufactured “health crisis” (Kristalina Georgieva, Head of I.M.F, April 2021: ‘This year, next year, vaccine policy is economic policy … a higher priority than the traditional tools of fiscal and monetary policy … without it we can not turn the fate of the world economy around …’) and that, in order to coerce men, women and children into taking a dangerous, harmful, experimental gene therapy vaccine, is a heinous crime against humanity.
I, a man, will not be silenced by War Criminals.
malice, mischief, ill-will,
sincerity and honour,
rights reserved, none waived ever.