The Extraordinary Claim

the great deception of VIROLOGY.

A microscopic particle, which has never been seen, spread around the world and caused the worst disease in over 100years.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” Carl Sagan

“What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence” Hitchens

“More than half of all published research findings are false and thats proven and demonstrably so” Kaufman

Why most published research findings are false” Ionnnidis John PA Plos Medicine August 2005, Vol 2 Issue 8 e124

3 pillars of virology

  1. Isolation. Their own methodology refutes isolation. Isolation in virology just means observation of cytopathic effect in the cell culture. Isolation of microscopic particles is possible and has been done in basic biology (even with the smallest microscopic organisms eg microbacteriophages. Virologists haven’t done control experiments since Enders and measles (1954) Dr Stephan Lanka did control experiment and refuted their isolation. He won the case “re proof of measles virus” in the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) , the First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed the ruling of the OLG Stuttgart.
  2. Electron Microscopy; once cytopathic effect is observed the culture is prepared for the microscope. The process involves freezing, thawing, bombardment with heavy metals like plutonium, shooting it with an electron beam that vaporizes all the water instantly. All that is left are the metallic stains. All biology is gone. So called virus particles are indistinguishable from exosomes and other extra cellular vesicles or MVBs multi vesicular bodies. (Kidney 360; Covid 19 Negative Renal Biopsies by electron microscopy- virus like particles found)
  3. In Silico genome sequencing.

in silico- literally in silicon, in the computer , referring to experimentation and analysis carried out in a computer environment rather than in the laboratory. It is the mimicking or modelling of biological within computer hardware and software

meaning it does not exist in real life, in biology.

Genome Template created in Wuhan, CDC (Fan Wu, Su Zhou paper) 28th January 2020

lung fluid taken from only ONE suspected case

RNA is extracted and includes all sources of RNA, human and microbial

RNA is analysed for concentration and length

RNA library is constructed

next generation unbiased computer sequencing (Metatranscriptomics )only short strands: 150 bases

many sequences are trimmed

Computer rebuilds the RNA into a sequence

total sequences found= 56.5 million

They chose one that resembled 80% match to SARS-1 (2003) (which was also never isolated and sequenced in silico also)

And they based the PCR test on this computer generated genome, the PCR test would amplify any given part of the sequence for a match creating a dragnet for cases worldwide.

Where is the evidence? Kevin Corbett

The Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Test ‘ used for initial hospital screening for the disease Covid-19 (assumed to be caused by this supposed ‘novel Coronavirus’) is thought to detect what is believed to be bits of ‘RNA’ from this ‘novel Coronavirus’. Similarly, the antibody test for this ‘novel Coronavirus’ is assumed to detect viral ‘antibodies’ but in Britain it was proven to be unsuitable (Smythe et al, 2020).

Data sheets (e.g. Roche, 2020) rushed out from the test manufacturers and fast-tracked for clinical use by the US Federal Drug Administration under Emergency Use Authorisation have dropped the requisite caveats that such tests MUST be confirmed by comparison with purified infectious virus – and not just from bits of RNA, the so-called ‘RNAaemia’ of Huang et al (2020 p499) assumed to come from a ‘novel Coronavirus’ based only on molecular/genetic similarity.

Maxims Of Law

The burden of proof is on he who maketh the claim.

Concealment of the truth is (equivalent to )a statement of what is false.

Suppression of fact that should be disclosed is the same effect as wilful misrepresentation

What is not proven and what does not exist are the same. It is not a defect of the law but of proof.