Category: Blog

Exosomes

-naturally occurring inside our bodies

-inside the cell- cell organelles and vesicles (different shapes enclosed in lipid bi-layer membrane) containing messenger RNA [communiques)

multi-vesicular endosomes within multiple exosomes within b4 release out of cell

-released from cell on a regular day to day basis

Many factors can induce the process, accelerate it and increase the numbers of exosomes released.

Exosomes are locked until they find the cell that is their key, they dock and deliver the message. Each is specific to a separate part of the body.

Function: communication between cells, sponge up toxins and protect the cell.

	Exosomes	SARS CoV-2
Diameter inside cell	500nm MVE	500nm
Diameter outside cell	100nm	100nm
Receptor	ACE-2	ACE-2
Contains	RNA	RNA
Found in	Bronchoalveolar fluid	Bronchoalveolar fluid

Essentially they are the same

James Hildreth MD, President & CEO of Meharry Medical College, former professor at Johns Hopkins, HIV Researcher,

“the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word”

Exosome production is induced and accelerated and increased by:

• toxic substances
• stress (fear)
• cancer
• ionising radiation
• infection
• injury
• immune response
• asthma
• diseases (unspecified in literature, many)
• electromagnetic radiation

Every type of insult to the body would cause this process- cells communicate to detox, clean out the dead and dying genetic debris.

“A Novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China 2019.”New England Medical Journal. Na Zhu and his team in Wuhan

-incubated sample with lung cancer cells

-lung cancer cells produce exosomes

“Exosomes act much like a sponge preventing the toxins for a time from attacking the cell, whhile toxins that are not corralled are left to burrow through the cell membranes” Ken Cadwell PhD

Exosomes come from within to help your body, a reaction to the real cause of illness.

I first knew about exosomes in April 2020. Virology is scientific fraud.

I told you about 5G…

With the almost mainstream airing of Dr. Aseem Mulhotra’s confessions (too little, too late) and John Bowe’s documentary film, the dam is about to burst. Everything on schedule. Fact is Joe Sixpack and his dog on the street warned about this way back in the early days of 2020.

We all have family, we all have friends.

Many of them couldn’t accept our point of view. And quite possibly, a wide social circle would have involved undue influences. Nudges and threats. Whatever the case, it is not their fault. Aseem Mulhotra and John Bowe will be remembered if they remain off the following list. You can watch the Safe & Effective doco here https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

Add to this list reasons of “Why didn’t you warn us?” please do so in the comments, there are many spaces to fill in. Lay on the vilification also if you are inclined to do so.

I’m starting it off with those directly involved in silencing me when I was arrested 18th October 2020 (fully cognizant of Germ Theory and the pseudoscience of virology) here in the beautiful .geographical location called Belfast, and outwards to the Ice Wall and beyond…

• Constable James Murphy
• Sergeant Richard Smith
• Christian Bradley (Bronze Commando)
• 02 Tactical Support Unit, Castlereagh, Belfast
• Silver and Gold Commandos (Belfast, 18th October 2020)
• The PSNI
• The PPS (Public Prosecution Service)
• Alison Dougan, Directing Officer, Senior Public Prosecutor (made decision to prosecute me as a criminal)
• Kevin Cromby, Clerk Of The Court, Belfast Magistrates, Laganside
• Stephen Herron, Director Public Prosecution Service NI.
• Judge Amanda Henderson, Administrator, Belfast Magistrates Court
• Natalie Pinkerton (Senior Crown Prosecutor)
• Stuart Hindley (Crown Prosecutor)
• The Crown

• Robin Swan Minister for Health
• Chief Medical Officer Michael Mc Bride
• Chief Scientific Adviser Ian Young
• Chief Pharmaceutical Officer Cathy Harris
• Former Chief Medical Officer Liz Mitchell
• Former Chief Nursing Officer Charlotte McArdle
• Chief Social Worker Sean Holland
• Deputy Chief Medical Officer Dr. Lourda Geoghegan
• Alasdair MacInnes, Health Protection Branch at Dept. Of Health
• Elizabeth Redmond, Senior Official, Dept. Of Health
• Kieran McAteer, Director Of Covid 19 Response at Dept Of Health
• Heather Stevens, Director Of Covid Strategy at Dept Of Health
• Eillis Mc Daniel. Director Of Family and Childrens Policy at Dept of Health
• Dr. Tom Black, Chairman British Medical Board
• Dr. Alan Stout, Chairman, British Medical Assoc. Northern Ireland GP Committee
• Dr. Sam Mc Conkey, Royal College Of Surgeons in Ireland
• Ultan Power, Virologist, Queens University, Belfast
• Dolores Cahill

• Sinn Fein: Michelle O Neill, Martina Anderson
• People Before Profit: Gerry Carrol, Health Committee
• SDLP: Colum Eastwood, Nicola Mallon
• Alliance: Naomi Long (Minister for Justice)
• DUP: Arlene Foster
• UUP: Robin Swan
• Mental Health Champion Siobhan O Neill
• DUP: Pam Cameron, Deputy Chair Health Committee
• Sinn Fein: Colm Gildernew, Chair Health Committee
• Sinn Fein: Orlaithi Flynn, Health Committee
• Alliance: Paula Bradshaw, Health Committee
• SDLP: Cara Hunter, Health Committee
• SDLP: Colin McGrath, Health Committee
• DUP: Alec Easton, Health Committee
• DUP: Jonathan Buckley, Health Committee
• Sinn Fein: Pat Sheehan, Health Committee
• UUP: Alan Chambers, Health Committee

• The BBC: William Crawley
• The Irish News: Claire Simpson, Alex Kane
• The McGill Office for Science and Society 

Their crimes against nature and God, and at Common Law and Statute against private civilians and non-combatants, included but not limited to, aiding, abetting and ancillary to:

The bigger picture…

• British Government
• SAGE and SPI-B, pyscho N
• MI6, MI5, GCHQ
• Cecil Rhodes Round Tables
• The Crown AKA The City Of London
• The Pilgrim Society
• British East India Trading Company
• The Federal Reserve
• International Banking Cartels
• Goldman Sachs
• Bank Of International Settlements, Switzerland
• Chatham House
• Royal Institute for International Affairs
• Council of Foreign Relations
• Trilateral Commission
• Atlantic Council
• Foundation Networks (Kissinger)
• United Nations Habitat Smart Cities Program
• Club Of Rome
• The Bilderberg Group
• Davos
• WEF
• Vanguard
• Blackrock
• State Street
• Alex Jones (Infowars)
• Simon Dolan
• Edward Snowden
• Julian Assange
• Stephen Nolan
• Trump
• General Michael Flynn (left his most loyal soldiers to be murdered in hospital)
• Jared Kushner
• Chabad Lubovitch
• Steve Scharzeman CEO Blackstone
• Larry Fink CEO Blackrock
• Rudy Guiliani
• Steve Poznciak
• Benjamin Netanyahu
• Unit 8200
• The Talpiot Program
• IDF
• Zohar Zisapel
• Vladimir Putin
•  Xi Jinping
• Ebrahim Raisi
• Bashar Hafez al-Assad
• Mohammed bin Salman
• Tony Blair
• Heinz Kissinger
• Jack Straw
• Chase Manhattan Corporation
• Lord Jacob Rothschild

• Brotherhood Of The Snake
• Hermetic Order Of The Golden Dawn

and what was I saying before I was rudely interrupted by Lord Jacob’s footsoldiers …

” This Covid-19 is not being caused by a virus. It is all a lie. Something else is causing it. Bechamps was right, Pasteur was wrong, he admitted it on his death bed. SARS-CoV-2 was made in a computer.

There is no SARS-CoV-2.”

A man called Paddy, silenced, and prosecuted.

I am not New Age, I am New Medicine

We are slaves, bonded instruments, bought and sold on the stock exchanges. The courts are marauding privateer vessels in dry dock. Cesta Que Vie Act 1666, Vatican and Canon Law, Unam Sanctum

The 5G system is a wireless network that operates in the 60GHz spectrum with download speeds of up to 10 Gbps compared to the 4G download speed of 10 Mbps. However, the frequency of 60 GHz is the frequency at which oxygen molecules oscillate. At 60 GHz, 98% of the transmitted 5G energy will be absorbed by atmospheric oxygen which then alters the orbital properties of the electrons of the oxygen molecules. “60GHz is the frequency of oxygen molecule absorption. Oxygen molecules have electrons that they share with each other, oxygen is a diatomic molecule. What we breathe are two oxygen molecules bonded together with the electrons that they share.” When the oxygen molecule is hit with 60GHz 5G waves, these waves affect the orbital resonance properties of those shared electrons. It is those shared electrons that bind to the hemoglobin in our blood.

When the oxygen is disrupted, it will no longer bind to the hemoglobin and myoglobin (oxygen carrying molecules) and therefore will not be able to carry oxygen to the cell’s powerhouse ‘mitochondria’. Without oxygen, the liver becomes congested and the body, and brain, begins to break down due to slow suffocation. Because the brain is the body organ most sensitive to the lack of oxygen, not getting enough oxygen to the brain will result in brain hypoxia. Brain hypoxia symptoms range from mild to severe. Mild symptoms include: cognitive disturbances, temporary memory loss, reduced ability to move your body, difficulty paying attention, difficulty making sound decisions. Severe symptoms include: fainting, seizure, coma, brain death.

The spectrum for 4G starts from 700 MHz to 5 GHz frequency bands. Compared to the frequencies below 5 GHz previously used by mobile devices, millimeter wave technology allows transmission on frequencies between 30 GHz and 300 GHz. These frequencies are called millimeter waves because they have wavelengths between 1 mm and 10 mm, while the wavelengths of the radio waves currently used by smartphones are mostly several dozen centimeters.

Health Effects of cumulative low intensity Radio Frequency radiation exposure include: DNA mutations, Mitochondrial damage, Tumors, cancer (children’s skulls receive more radiation) Heart palpitations, Memory and cognitive problems, Sperm changes and infertility, Headaches, migraines, ringing of ears, ADHD ,Anxiety Depression Heart and Disease Type-2 Diabetes

Radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) radiation affect the Schumann Resonance signals which are the mechanism through which melatonin production is activated. The frequencies also affect the bodies ability to produce Vitamin D (Vitamin D deficiency causes cold and flu due to the weakening of the immune system. This is the reason why people are prone to cold and flu in the winter season).

The electromagnetic radiation in the microwave frequency range ‘are absorbed by water, fats, sugars, and certain other molecules, whose consequent vibrations produce *heat*.’ Similar to microwave ovens which generate radiation at a frequency of about 2.45GHz (the microwave energy is converted to thermal energy by causing water molecules to flip back and forth some 2.45 billion times a second…The 60 GHz used by the 5G system causes water molecules to flip back and forth 60 billion times a second!!!)

The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats

The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G.

Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is a comprehensive research review of RF effects in human and animal research. The review concludes that scientific evidence is now adequate to conclude radiofrequency radiation is carcinogenic to humans (Miller 2018). Several previously published studies also concluded that RF can “cause” cancer, for example, Hardell 2017, Atzman 2016 and Peleg 2018.

Published Research Documents Adverse Effects of RF Exposure

The Ramazzini Institute (RI) Study on Base Station RF  was another large scale rat study that also found increases in the same heart cancers as the NTP study found—yet the Ramazzini rats were exposed to much lower levels of RF than the NTP rats. In fact, all the RI Ramazzini radiation exposures were below FCC limits, as the study was specifically designed to test the safety of RF limits for cell tower/base stations (Falconi 2018.)

Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans” is a replication study that used very, very low RF exposures (lower than the Ramazzini and NTP study) and combined the RF with a known carcinogen. Researchers found elevated lymphoma and significantly higher numbers of tumors in the lungs and livers in the animals exposed to both RF and the carcinogen, leading researchers to state that previous research (Tillman 2010) was confirmed and that “our results show that electromagnetic fields obviously enhance the growth of tumors” (Lerchl 2015).

5G Wireless Expansion: Public Health and Environmental Implications is a 5G research review that documents the range of reported adverse effects of RF and millimeter waves—effects range from cancer to bacteria growth changes to DNA damage. The study concludes that “a moratorium on the deployment of 5G is warranted” and “the addition of this added high frequency 5G radiation to an already complex mix of lower frequencies, will contribute to a negative public health outcome … from both physical and mental health perspectives” (Russell 2018).

“The Human Skin as a Sub-THz Receiver – Does 5G Pose a Danger to It or Not?” and “The Modeling of the Absorbance of Sub-THz Radiation by Human Skin” are two papers by physicists presenting research that found higher 5G frequencies are intensely absorbed into human sweat ducts (in skin), at much higher absorption levels than other parts of our skin’s tissues (Betzalel 2017, Betzalel 2018). The researchers conclude, “we are raising a warning flag against the unrestricted use of sub-THz technologies for communication, before the possible consequences for public health are explored.”

“Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz” published in Scientific Reports is the first study to investigate how insects (including the Western honeybee) absorb the higher frequencies (2 GHz to 120 GHz) to be used in the 4G/5G rollout. The scientific simulations showed increases in absorbed power between 3% to 370% when the insects were exposed to the frequencies. Researchers concluded, “This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time….”

“A review of the ecological effects of RF-EMF” reviewed 113 studies finding RF-EMF had a significant effect on birds, insects, other vertebrates, other organisms and plants in 70% of the studies (Cucurachi 2013). Development and reproduction in birds and insects were the most strongly affected. As an example of the several studies on wildlife impacts, a study focusing on RF from antennas found increased sperm abnormalities in mice exposed to RF from GSM antennas (Otitoloju 2010). Studies on bees have found behavioral effects (Kumar 2011, Favre 2011), disrupted navigation Goldsworthy 2009, Sainudeen 2011, Kimmel et al. 2007) decreasing egg laying rate (Sharma and Kumar, 2010) and reduced colony strength (Sharma and Kumar, 2010, Harst et al. 2006). Research has also found a high level of damage to trees from antenna radiation (Waldmann-Selsam 2016).

“Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?” is a research review that details how research has found that millimeter waves can alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes.” The researchers conclude, “available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle” (Di Ciaula 2018).  

Research on People Near Cell Towers Links Exposure to Adverse Effects

“The Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base station” is a research study that compared people living close (within 80 meters) and far (more than 300 meters away) from cellular antennas and found that the people living closer had several significant changes in their blood predictive of cancer development (Zothansiama 2017). Researchers controlled for various demographics, including the use of microwaves and wireless in the homes.   

“Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations” is a 10 year study by the Belo Horizonte Brazil Health Department and several universities in Brazil that found an elevated relative risk of cancer mortality at residential distances of 500 meters or less from cell installations (Dode 2011). Shortly after this study was published, the city prosecutor sued several cell phone companies and requested that almost half of the city’s antennas be removed. Many antennas were dismantled.

A 2019 study of students in schools near cell towers found their higher RF exposure was associated with impacts on motor skills, memory and attention (Meo 2019). Examples of other effects linked to cell towers in research studies include neuropsychiatric problems, elevated diabetes, headaches, sleep problems and genetic damage. Such research continues to accumulate after the 2010 landmark review study on 56 studies that reported biological effects found at very low intensities, including impacts on reproduction, permeability of the blood-brain barrier, behavior, cellular and metabolic changes, and increases in cancer risk (Lai and Levitt 2010).  

Cellular Antennas Create Measurable Increases in Radiation in the Area

A 2018 article published in The Lancet Planetary Health points to unprecedented increasing RF exposures (Bandara and Carpenter 2018). Another key finding from Zothansiama 2017 was that homes closer to antennas had measurably higher radiation levels—adding to the documentation that antennas increase RF levels. An Australian study also found that children in kindergartens with nearby antenna installations had nearly three-and-a-half times higher RF exposures than children with installations further away (more than 300 meters (Bhatt 2016).  

A 2018 multi-country study that measured RF in several countries found that cell phone tower radiation is the dominant contributor to RF exposure in most outdoor areas exposure in urban areas was higher and that exposure has drastically increased. As an example, the measurements the researchers took in Los Angeles, USA were 70 times higher than the US EPA estimate 40 years ago.

Two recent papers that have investigated frequencies to be used in 5G have called out the need to reevaluate current guidelines due to the unique  way higher frequencies interact with human tissue. These studies are clear documentation of the reality that 5G technology is being rolled out before adequate research on human exposures. “Systematic Derivation of Safety Limits for Time-Varying 5G Radiofrequency Exposure Based on Analytical Models and Thermal Dose concludes that the “results also show that the peak-to-average ratio of 1,000 tolerated by the International Council on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines may lead to permanent tissue damage after even short exposures, highlighting the importance of revisiting existing exposure guidelines.” “Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink concludes “our results show that 5G downlink RF fields generate significantly higher power density (PD) and specific absorption rate (SAR) than a current cellular system. This paper also shows that SAR should also be taken into account for determining human RF exposure in the mmW downlink.”

Note: This is just a small sampling of research on radio frequency microwave radiation. EHT has more research on millimeter waves and 4/5G here. 

For more please see:

• The Bioinitiative Report: An extensive report authored by international scientists published in the field of EMF’s calling for the reform of outdated safety standards due to the mounting evidence of health effects from electromagnetic fields (1479 pages of scientific evidence).
  • Research Abstracts: These are invaluable sets of abstracts (data-based to be searchable) covering the RFR scientific literature, as well as collections of scientific abstracts on free radical damage (from both RFR and ELF) and a set specific to electrosensitivity.  They cover the research published between 1990-2014.
  • Color Charts at Exposure Levels: These invaluable charts detail the published science showing biological effects at different exposure levels. We highly recommend that you take the time to review them.
• Annotated Bibliography of Scientific Papers Finding Evidence of Harm from Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Published between August, 2016 and July, 2018 Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D. School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley which contains 92 papers published in scientific journals during the last two years that report evidence of harm from cell phone radiation exposure.
• PowerWatch: 1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health
• “5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them” by Dr. Martin Pall
• The Oceania Radiofrequency Science Advisory Association: The Oceania Radiofrequency Science Advisory Association (ORSAA) Database is a searchable database on peer-reviewed scientific studies and articles on bioeffect research of electromagnetic fields. The database is designed to enable detailed independent searches invaluable to researchers and scientists. It requires some training on how to use it most effectively.
• Dr. Joel Moskowitz of UC Berkeley maintains a blog of research studies and policy updates here.